Kiribati vs Libya: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Kiribati
0 kt
in 2024
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Kiribati rank
122nd
Libya rank
122nd
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Kiribati
- Libya
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 122nd and Libya ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Kiribati or Libya?
- Kiribati, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Kiribati and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Libya?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Libya rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Kiribati ranks 122nd and Libya ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.