Latvia vs Libya: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia rank
122nd
Libya rank
122nd
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Latvia
- Libya
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 122nd and Libya ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0269 kt | 0 kt | 0.0269 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0623 kt | 0 kt | 0.0623 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0097 kt | 0 kt | 0.0097 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.0005 kt | 0 kt | 0.0005 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Latvia or Libya?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Latvia and Libya?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Libya?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Libya rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Latvia ranks 122nd and Libya ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.