Libya vs Tuvalu: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1
Libya
0 kt
in 2024
Tuvalu
0 kt
in 2024
Libya rank
122nd
Tuvalu rank
122nd
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Libya
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Libya currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Tuvalu, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 122nd and Tuvalu ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1, Libya or Tuvalu?
- Libya, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Tuvalu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1 between Libya and Tuvalu?
- 0 kt, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Tuvalu?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Tuvalu rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4) — fao tier 1?
- Libya ranks 122nd and Tuvalu ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.