Cuba vs Eswatini: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita (CH4 capita)
Cuba
0 kt per person
in 2023
Eswatini
0 kt per person
in 2023
Cuba rank
33rd
Eswatini rank
36th
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita (CH4 capita) over time
- Cuba
- Eswatini
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Eswatini, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.8 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Cuba ranks 33rd and Eswatini ranks 36th of 199 countries.
Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita, Cuba or Eswatini?
- Cuba, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Eswatini as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita between Cuba and Eswatini?
- 0 kt per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Eswatini?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Eswatini rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Cuba ranks 33rd and Eswatini ranks 36th of 199 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.