Belgium vs Sri Lanka: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Belgium
0 kt per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 kt per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
102nd
Sri Lanka rank
102nd
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Belgium
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kt per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Belgium ranks 102nd and Sri Lanka ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita, Belgium or Sri Lanka?
- Belgium, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita between Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kt per person, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sri Lanka rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Belgium ranks 102nd and Sri Lanka ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.