Canada vs Nepal: Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita
Canada
0 kt per person
in 2024
Nepal
0 kt per person
in 2024
Canada rank
14th
Nepal rank
15th
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita over time
- Canada
- Nepal
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nepal, a difference of 0 kt per person.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Canada ahead.
Canada ranks 14th and Nepal ranks 15th of 186 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Canada |
| 2000s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Canada |
| 2010s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Canada |
| 2020s | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | 0 kt per person | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita, Canada or Nepal?
- Canada, at 0 kt per person against 0 kt per person in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita between Canada and Nepal?
- 0 kt per person, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Nepal?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Canada and Nepal rank globally for forest fires — emissions (ch4), per capita?
- Canada ranks 14th and Nepal ranks 15th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Emissions (CH4), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Emissions (CH4) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.