China, Hong Kong SAR vs Latvia: Forest fires — Emissions
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
111th
Latvia rank
111th
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Latvia
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 181 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5.03 kt | 45.99 kt | 40.96 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.8703 kt | 6.84 kt | 5.97 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.3508 kt | 0.3508 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Latvia?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Latvia rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 111th and Latvia ranks 111th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.