Latvia vs Namibia: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Namibia
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia rank
121st
Namibia rank
121st
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Latvia
- Namibia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Namibia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 121st and Namibia ranks 121st of 198 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 45.99 kt | 1.74 kt | 44.25 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 6.84 kt | 4.7 kt | 2.14 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0.3508 kt | 12.87 kt | 12.52 kt | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1, Latvia or Namibia?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1 between Latvia and Namibia?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Namibia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Namibia rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1?
- Latvia ranks 121st and Namibia ranks 121st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.