Micronesia vs Rwanda: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1
Micronesia
0 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt
in 2024
Micronesia rank
121st
Rwanda rank
121st
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Micronesia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Micronesia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 24 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.
Micronesia ranks 121st and Rwanda ranks 121st of 198 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 kt | 13.13 kt | 13.13 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 15.46 kt | 15.46 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 9.03 kt | 9.03 kt | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1, Micronesia or Rwanda?
- Micronesia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1 between Micronesia and Rwanda?
- 0 kt, with Micronesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Micronesia and Rwanda rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1?
- Micronesia ranks 121st and Rwanda ranks 121st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.