Namibia vs Rwanda: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1
Namibia
0 kt
in 2024
Rwanda
0 kt
in 2024
Namibia rank
121st
Rwanda rank
121st
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1 over time
- Namibia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Rwanda ahead.
Namibia ranks 121st and Rwanda ranks 121st of 198 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.74 kt | 13.13 kt | 11.39 kt | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 4.7 kt | 15.46 kt | 10.77 kt | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 12.87 kt | 9.03 kt | 3.84 kt | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1, Namibia or Rwanda?
- Namibia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1 between Namibia and Rwanda?
- 0 kt, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Rwanda?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Rwanda rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2) — fao tier 1?
- Namibia ranks 121st and Rwanda ranks 121st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2) — FAO TIER 1. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.