Cyprus vs Denmark: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Cyprus
- Denmark
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Denmark, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Denmark ahead.
Cyprus ranks 106th and Denmark ranks 106th of 214 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | Denmark | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0432 kt | 0.1057 kt | 0.0625 kt | Denmark |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 0.0208 kt | 0.0208 kt | Denmark |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2eq), Cyprus or Denmark?
- Cyprus, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Denmark as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2eq) between Cyprus and Denmark?
- 0 kt, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Denmark?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Cyprus and Denmark rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Cyprus ranks 106th and Denmark ranks 106th of 214 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf