Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq)

Democratic Republic of the Congo
22,146 kt
in 2023
United Republic of Tanzania
4,124 kt
in 2023
Democratic Republic of the Congo rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
13th

Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time

  • Democratic Republic of the Congo
  • United Republic of Tanzania
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k199020062023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of the Congo currently reports 22,146 kt against 4,124 kt in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 18,022 kt.

That makes Democratic Republic of the Congo's figure about 5.4 times United Republic of Tanzania's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Democratic Republic of the Congo has been ahead every year.

Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 254 countries.

Democratic Republic of the Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of the Congo United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
1990s 30,825 kt 5,001 kt 25,824 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2000s 30,363 kt 8,645 kt 21,717 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2010s 32,682 kt 9,231 kt 23,452 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo
2020s 26,031 kt 5,538 kt 20,493 kt Democratic Republic of the Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2eq), Democratic Republic of the Congo or United Republic of Tanzania?
Democratic Republic of the Congo, at 22,146 kt against 4,124 kt in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2023.
What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2eq) between Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
18,022 kt, with Democratic Republic of the Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania?
34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of the Congo and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2eq)?
Democratic Republic of the Congo ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 13th of 254 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq). Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-fires-emissions-co2eq-ar5-fao-tier-1/democratic-republic-of-the-congo/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Democratic Republic of the Congo vs United Republic of Tanzania: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5)
Unit
kt
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
288 places, 9,567 data points, 1990–2023
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf