Estonia vs Iraq: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Estonia
- Iraq
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Iraq, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Iraq ahead.
Estonia ranks 106th and Iraq ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Iraq in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.33 kt | 9.67 kt | 8.34 kt | Iraq |
| 2000s | 1.22 kt | 2.8 kt | 1.58 kt | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0.2074 kt | 0 kt | 0.2074 kt | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2eq), Estonia or Iraq?
- Estonia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Iraq as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2eq) between Estonia and Iraq?
- 0 kt, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Iraq?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia and Iraq rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Estonia ranks 106th and Iraq ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf