Libya vs Mongolia: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Libya
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.109 kt against 0 kt in Libya, a difference of 0.109 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.
Libya ranks 119th and Mongolia ranks 118th of 236 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt | 395.35 kt | 395.35 kt | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 92.49 kt | 92.49 kt | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 12.59 kt | 12.59 kt | Mongolia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0.1097 kt | 0.1097 kt | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2eq), Libya or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 0.109 kt against 0 kt in Libya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2eq) between Libya and Mongolia?
- 0.109 kt, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Mongolia?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Mongolia rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Libya ranks 119th and Mongolia ranks 118th of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf