Mali vs Slovakia: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Mali
- Slovakia
How they compare
Mali currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovakia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Mali ahead.
Mali ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mali | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,881 kt | 0.3377 kt | 2,881 kt | Mali |
| 2000s | 264.59 kt | 0.2731 kt | 264.32 kt | Mali |
| 2010s | 1.09 kt | 0.2346 kt | 0.8598 kt | Mali |
| 2020s | 0.659 kt | 0.0307 kt | 0.6282 kt | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2eq), Mali or Slovakia?
- Mali, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Slovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2eq) between Mali and Slovakia?
- 0 kt, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mali and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Mali and Slovakia rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Mali ranks 106th and Slovakia ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf