Mayotte vs Uzbekistan: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Mayotte
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Mayotte currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Mayotte ranks 106th and Uzbekistan ranks 106th of 219 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mayotte | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0923 kt | 37.4 kt | 37.31 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 0 kt | 6.16 kt | 6.16 kt | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2eq), Mayotte or Uzbekistan?
- Mayotte, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2eq) between Mayotte and Uzbekistan?
- 0 kt, with Mayotte ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Mayotte and Uzbekistan rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Mayotte ranks 106th and Uzbekistan ranks 106th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf