Suriname vs Togo: Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq)
Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) over time
- Suriname
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 10.13 kt against 10.13 kt in Suriname, a difference of 0 kt.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 65th and Togo ranks 64th of 219 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.8 kt | 110.3 kt | 87.49 kt | Togo |
| 2000s | 6.21 kt | 28.56 kt | 22.35 kt | Togo |
| 2010s | 2.93 kt | 8.47 kt | 5.54 kt | Togo |
| 2020s | 4.61 kt | 16.45 kt | 11.84 kt | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (co2eq), Suriname or Togo?
- Togo, at 10.13 kt against 10.13 kt in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (co2eq) between Suriname and Togo?
- 0 kt, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Togo?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Suriname and Togo rank globally for forest fires — emissions (co2eq)?
- Suriname ranks 65th and Togo ranks 64th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf