Angola vs Laos: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Angola
- Laos
How they compare
Angola currently reports 17.75 kt against 9.9 kt in Laos, a difference of 7.85 kt.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.8 times Laos's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 8th and Laos ranks 11th of 254 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 21.28 kt | 3.3 kt | 17.98 kt | Angola |
| 2000s | 25.72 kt | 4.28 kt | 21.43 kt | Angola |
| 2010s | 31.07 kt | 3.64 kt | 27.44 kt | Angola |
| 2020s | 21.13 kt | 5.03 kt | 16.1 kt | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Angola or Laos?
- Angola, at 17.75 kt against 9.9 kt in Laos as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Angola and Laos?
- 7.85 kt, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Laos?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Angola and Laos rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Angola ranks 8th and Laos ranks 11th of 254 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf