Japan vs Panama: Forest fires — Emissions
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Japan
- Panama
How they compare
Japan currently reports 0.0107 kt against 0.0102 kt in Panama, a difference of 0.0005 kt.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 70th and Panama ranks 72nd of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 3 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.021 kt | 0.017 kt | 0.004 kt | Japan |
| 2000s | 0.0218 kt | 0.0395 kt | 0.0177 kt | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.0256 kt | 0.0137 kt | 0.012 kt | Japan |
| 2020s | 0.0247 kt | 0.0035 kt | 0.0213 kt | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Japan or Panama?
- Japan, at 0.0107 kt against 0.0102 kt in Panama as of 2023.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Japan and Panama?
- 0.0005 kt, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Panama?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Japan and Panama rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Japan ranks 70th and Panama ranks 72nd of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions Totals summarizes the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions disseminated in the FAOSTAT Climate Change domains of emissions from agrifood systems. Data are computed following the Tier 1 methods of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Guidelines for National greenhouse gas (GHG) Inventories (IPCC, 1996; 1997; 2000; 2002; 2006; 2014). Emissions from other economic sectors as defined by the IPCC are also disseminated in the domain for completeness. Methodological details can be found at: https://files-faostat.fao.org/production/GT/GT_en.pdf