Burkina Faso vs Latvia: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O)
Burkina Faso
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Burkina Faso rank
112th
Latvia rank
112th
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Burkina Faso
- Latvia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Burkina Faso ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9049 kt | 0.0019 kt | 0.903 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2000s | 0.1336 kt | 0.0056 kt | 0.128 kt | Burkina Faso |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0008 kt | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Burkina Faso or Latvia?
- Burkina Faso, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 0 kt, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Burkina Faso and Latvia rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Burkina Faso ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.