China, Hong Kong SAR vs Norway: Forest fires — Emissions
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 kt
in 2024
Norway
0 kt
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
112th
Norway rank
112th
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Norway
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Norway ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 112th and Norway ranks 112th of 219 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0004 kt | 0.0024 kt | 0.002 kt | Norway |
| 2000s | 0.0006 kt | 0.0009 kt | 0.0003 kt | Norway |
| 2010s | 0.0001 kt | 0.0003 kt | 0.0002 kt | Norway |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, China, Hong Kong SAR or Norway?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between China, Hong Kong SAR and Norway?
- 0 kt, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Norway rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 112th and Norway ranks 112th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.