Latvia vs Polynesia: Forest fires — Emissions
Latvia
0 kt
in 2024
Polynesia
0 kt
in 2024
Latvia rank
122nd
Polynesia rank
122nd
Forest fires — Emissions over time
- Latvia
- Polynesia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 15 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 122nd and Polynesia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Polynesia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0019 kt | 0.0016 kt | 0.0003 kt | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0056 kt | 0 kt | 0.0055 kt | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.0009 kt | 0.0011 kt | 0.0002 kt | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 0 kt | 0 kt | 0 kt | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Latvia or Polynesia?
- Latvia, at 0 kt against 0 kt in Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Latvia and Polynesia?
- 0 kt, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Polynesia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Polynesia rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Latvia ranks 122nd and Polynesia ranks 122nd of 236 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.