New Caledonia vs Uruguay: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O)
New Caledonia
0.0005 kt
in 2024
Uruguay
0.0005 kt
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
100th
Uruguay rank
100th
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- New Caledonia
- Uruguay
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 0.0005 kt against 0.0005 kt in Uruguay, a difference of 0 kt.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.
New Caledonia ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 219 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0035 kt | 0.0137 kt | 0.0102 kt | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.003 kt | 0.007 kt | 0.004 kt | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.0031 kt | 0.0044 kt | 0.0013 kt | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.0003 kt | 0.022 kt | 0.0217 kt | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, New Caledonia or Uruguay?
- New Caledonia, at 0.0005 kt against 0.0005 kt in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between New Caledonia and Uruguay?
- 0 kt, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and Uruguay rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- New Caledonia ranks 100th and Uruguay ranks 100th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.