Suriname vs Zimbabwe: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O)
Suriname
0.1367 kt
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.1812 kt
in 2024
Suriname rank
49th
Zimbabwe rank
46th
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O) over time
- Suriname
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.1812 kt against 0.1367 kt in Suriname, a difference of 0.0445 kt.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Suriname's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Suriname ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 219 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0222 kt | 0.286 kt | 0.2638 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0.0103 kt | 0.2313 kt | 0.2211 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0.0051 kt | 0.4221 kt | 0.417 kt | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0.0338 kt | 0.1075 kt | 0.0737 kt | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions, Suriname or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.1812 kt against 0.1367 kt in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions between Suriname and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0445 kt, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Suriname and Zimbabwe rank globally for forest fires — emissions?
- Suriname ranks 49th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 219 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.