Latvia vs Morocco: Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Morocco
0 kt per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
100th
Morocco rank
97th
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Morocco
How they compare
Morocco currently reports 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 kt per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 100th and Morocco ranks 97th of 183 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | 0 kt per US$ of GDP | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest fires — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp, Latvia or Morocco?
- Morocco, at 0 kt per US$ of GDP against 0 kt per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in forest fires — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp between Latvia and Morocco?
- 0 kt per US$ of GDP, with Morocco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Morocco?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Morocco rank globally for forest fires — emissions (n2o), per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 100th and Morocco ranks 97th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest fires — Emissions (N2O), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest fires — Emissions (N2O) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.