Aruba vs Southern Africa: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Aruba
8.33 % change on previous year
in 2025
Southern Africa
0.7433 % change on previous year
in 2025
Aruba rank
3rd
Southern Africa rank
4th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Aruba
  • Southern Africa
-10-50510199120082025

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 8.33 % change on previous year against 0.7433 % change on previous year in Southern Africa, a difference of 7.59 % change on previous year.

That makes Aruba's figure about 11.2 times Southern Africa's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Southern Africa ahead.

Aruba ranks 3rd and Southern Africa ranks 4th of 249 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Southern Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Southern Africa Difference Ahead
1990s -1.04 % change on previous year 0.0328 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year Southern Africa
2000s 0.0546 % change on previous year 0.1296 % change on previous year 0.075 % change on previous year Southern Africa
2010s 0.2097 % change on previous year -0.1071 % change on previous year 0.3169 % change on previous year Aruba
2020s 1.53 % change on previous year 0.5491 % change on previous year 0.9818 % change on previous year Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Aruba or Southern Africa?
Aruba, at 8.33 % change on previous year against 0.7433 % change on previous year in Southern Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Aruba and Southern Africa?
7.59 % change on previous year, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Southern Africa?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Aruba and Southern Africa rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Aruba ranks 3rd and Southern Africa ranks 4th of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Southern Africa: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/aruba/southern-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/aruba/southern-africa/">Aruba vs Southern Africa: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.