Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Costa Rica: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
0.1053 % change on previous year
in 2025
Costa Rica
0.1174 % change on previous year
in 2025
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha rank
79th
Costa Rica rank
76th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha
  • Costa Rica
-0.200.20.40.6199120082025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 0.1174 % change on previous year against 0.1053 % change on previous year in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 0.0121 % change on previous year.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Costa Rica has been ahead every year.

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 79th and Costa Rica ranks 76th of 249 countries.

Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0117 % change on previous year 0.3233 % change on previous year 0.335 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2000s 0 % change on previous year 0.1316 % change on previous year 0.1316 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2010s 0 % change on previous year 0.3116 % change on previous year 0.3116 % change on previous year Costa Rica
2020s 0.0176 % change on previous year 0.1182 % change on previous year 0.1007 % change on previous year Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 0.1174 % change on previous year against 0.1053 % change on previous year in Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Costa Rica?
0.0121 % change on previous year, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Costa Rica?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha and Costa Rica rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha ranks 79th and Costa Rica ranks 76th of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Costa Rica: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/ascension-saint-helena-and-tristan-da-cunha/costa-rica/">Ascension, Saint Helena and Tristan da Cunha vs Costa Rica: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.