Australia and New Zealand vs Saudi Arabia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Saudi Arabia
How they compare
Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0719 % change on previous year against 0.0549 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 0.017 % change on previous year.
That makes Saudi Arabia's figure about 1.3 times Australia and New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 87th and Saudi Arabia ranks 85th of 249 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Saudi Arabia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0613 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.0613 % change on previous year | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | -0.0861 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.0861 % change on previous year | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 0.0823 % change on previous year | 0 % change on previous year | 0.0823 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 0.061 % change on previous year | 0.06 % change on previous year | 0.0009 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Saudi Arabia?
- Saudi Arabia, at 0.0719 % change on previous year against 0.0549 % change on previous year in Australia and New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 0.017 % change on previous year, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Saudi Arabia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Saudi Arabia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 87th and Saudi Arabia ranks 85th of 249 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.