Australia and New Zealand vs Sudan (former): Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 0.0549 % change on previous year against 0.041 % change on previous year in Sudan (former), a difference of 0.0139 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Sudan (former)'s.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sudan (former) ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 87th and Sudan (former) ranks 88th of 249 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.0613 % change on previous year | 0.003 % change on previous year | 0.0643 % change on previous year | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | -0.0861 % change on previous year | 0.0178 % change on previous year | 0.1039 % change on previous year | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 0.0117 % change on previous year | 0.03 % change on previous year | 0.0183 % change on previous year | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Australia and New Zealand or Sudan (former)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 0.0549 % change on previous year against 0.041 % change on previous year in Sudan (former) as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Australia and New Zealand and Sudan (former)?
- 0.0139 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sudan (former)?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Sudan (former) rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 87th and Sudan (former) ranks 88th of 249 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.