Australia vs Congo: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Australia
0.0405 % change on previous year
in 2025
Congo
0.064 % change on previous year
in 2025
Australia rank
89th
Congo rank
86th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time
- Australia
- Congo
How they compare
Congo currently reports 0.064 % change on previous year against 0.0405 % change on previous year in Australia, a difference of 0.0235 % change on previous year.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.6 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Congo ahead.
Australia ranks 89th and Congo ranks 86th of 249 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Congo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1245 % change on previous year | -0.054 % change on previous year | 0.0705 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2000s | -0.1586 % change on previous year | -0.0543 % change on previous year | 0.1043 % change on previous year | Congo |
| 2010s | 0.0415 % change on previous year | -0.0991 % change on previous year | 0.1406 % change on previous year | Australia |
| 2020s | 0.0434 % change on previous year | 0.0337 % change on previous year | 0.0097 % change on previous year | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Australia or Congo?
- Congo, at 0.064 % change on previous year against 0.0405 % change on previous year in Australia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Australia and Congo?
- 0.0235 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Congo rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
- Australia ranks 89th and Congo ranks 86th of 249 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.