Central Asia vs Pitcairn: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Central Asia
-0.3031 % change on previous year
in 2025
Pitcairn
1.64 % change on previous year
in 2025
Central Asia rank
24th
Pitcairn rank
24th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Central Asia
  • Pitcairn
-2-1012199120082025

How they compare

Pitcairn currently reports 1.64 % change on previous year against -0.3031 % change on previous year in Central Asia, a difference of 1.94 % change on previous year.

That makes Pitcairn's figure about 5.4 times Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Central Asia ahead.

Central Asia ranks 24th and Pitcairn ranks 24th of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 3 and Pitcairn in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Asia Pitcairn Difference Ahead
1990s 0.227 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0.227 % change on previous year Central Asia
2000s 0.2312 % change on previous year 0.0027 % change on previous year 0.2286 % change on previous year Central Asia
2010s 0.7865 % change on previous year 0.0053 % change on previous year 0.7812 % change on previous year Central Asia
2020s -0.1616 % change on previous year 0.2782 % change on previous year 0.4398 % change on previous year Pitcairn

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Central Asia or Pitcairn?
Pitcairn, at 1.64 % change on previous year against -0.3031 % change on previous year in Central Asia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Central Asia and Pitcairn?
1.94 % change on previous year, with Pitcairn ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Pitcairn?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Central Asia and Pitcairn rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Central Asia ranks 24th and Pitcairn ranks 24th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Asia vs Pitcairn: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/central-asia/pitcairn/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/central-asia/pitcairn/">Central Asia vs Pitcairn: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.