Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Costa Rica
0.1174 % change on previous year
in 2025
New Zealand
0.1518 % change on previous year
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
76th
New Zealand rank
73rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Costa Rica
  • New Zealand
0.10.20.30.40.5199120082025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.1518 % change on previous year against 0.1174 % change on previous year in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.0344 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 76th and New Zealand ranks 73rd of 249 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3233 % change on previous year 0.3931 % change on previous year 0.0697 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 0.1316 % change on previous year 0.4101 % change on previous year 0.2785 % change on previous year New Zealand
2010s 0.3116 % change on previous year 0.3488 % change on previous year 0.0372 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s 0.1182 % change on previous year 0.1733 % change on previous year 0.0551 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Costa Rica or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.1518 % change on previous year against 0.1174 % change on previous year in Costa Rica as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Costa Rica and New Zealand?
0.0344 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and New Zealand rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Costa Rica ranks 76th and New Zealand ranks 73rd of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/costa-rica/new-zealand/">Costa Rica vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.