Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
0.1459 % change on previous year
in 2025
New Zealand
0.1518 % change on previous year
in 2025
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
74th
New Zealand rank
73rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • New Zealand
00.10.20.30.4199120082025

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.1518 % change on previous year against 0.1459 % change on previous year in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 0.0059 % change on previous year.

Across all 35 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 74th and New Zealand ranks 73rd of 249 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0342 % change on previous year 0.3931 % change on previous year 0.3589 % change on previous year New Zealand
2000s 0.2685 % change on previous year 0.4101 % change on previous year 0.1416 % change on previous year New Zealand
2010s 0.1637 % change on previous year 0.3488 % change on previous year 0.1851 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s 0.1474 % change on previous year 0.1733 % change on previous year 0.0259 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.1518 % change on previous year against 0.1459 % change on previous year in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and New Zealand?
0.0059 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and New Zealand?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and New Zealand rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 74th and New Zealand ranks 73rd of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/new-zealand/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs New Zealand: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.