Denmark vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Denmark
1.52 % change on previous year
in 2025
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
-0.2691 % change on previous year
in 2025
Denmark rank
25th
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
23rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Denmark
  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
02.557.51012.5199120082025

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 1.52 % change on previous year against -0.2691 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 1.79 % change on previous year.

That makes Denmark's figure about 5.6 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Denmark ahead.

Denmark ranks 25th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 23rd of 249 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 3 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7144 % change on previous year 1.15 % change on previous year 0.4347 % change on previous year Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 0.9111 % change on previous year -0.2618 % change on previous year 1.17 % change on previous year Denmark
2010s 1.35 % change on previous year -0.1404 % change on previous year 1.49 % change on previous year Denmark
2020s 1.37 % change on previous year -0.2763 % change on previous year 1.65 % change on previous year Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Denmark or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
Denmark, at 1.52 % change on previous year against -0.2691 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Denmark and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
1.79 % change on previous year, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Denmark and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Denmark ranks 25th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 23rd of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/denmark/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/denmark/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/">Denmark vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.