Eastern Europe vs Iceland: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Eastern Europe
0.7494 % change on previous year
in 2025
Iceland
3.88 % change on previous year
in 2025
Eastern Europe rank
3rd
Iceland rank
6th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Eastern Europe
  • Iceland
0510199120082025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 3.88 % change on previous year against 0.7494 % change on previous year in Eastern Europe, a difference of 3.13 % change on previous year.

That makes Iceland's figure about 5.2 times Eastern Europe's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Iceland ahead.

Eastern Europe ranks 3rd and Iceland ranks 6th of 32 groups.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Europe Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5664 % change on previous year 2.79 % change on previous year 2.23 % change on previous year Iceland
2000s 0.8912 % change on previous year 5.7 % change on previous year 4.81 % change on previous year Iceland
2010s 0.6593 % change on previous year 7.33 % change on previous year 6.67 % change on previous year Iceland
2020s 0.7329 % change on previous year 4.75 % change on previous year 4.02 % change on previous year Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Eastern Europe or Iceland?
Iceland, at 3.88 % change on previous year against 0.7494 % change on previous year in Eastern Europe as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Eastern Europe and Iceland?
3.13 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Iceland?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Eastern Europe and Iceland rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Eastern Europe ranks 3rd and Iceland ranks 6th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Europe vs Iceland: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/eastern-europe/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/eastern-europe/iceland/">Eastern Europe vs Iceland: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.