Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
-0.33 % change on previous year
in 2025
Uzbekistan
1.18 % change on previous year
in 2025
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
25th
Uzbekistan rank
28th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Uzbekistan
-0.500.51199120082025

How they compare

Uzbekistan currently reports 1.18 % change on previous year against -0.33 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 1.51 % change on previous year.

That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 3.6 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

Across all 33 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 25th and Uzbekistan ranks 28th of 32 groups.

Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Uzbekistan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4375 % change on previous year 0.3172 % change on previous year 0.7548 % change on previous year Uzbekistan
2000s -0.4606 % change on previous year 0.3064 % change on previous year 0.767 % change on previous year Uzbekistan
2010s -0.5211 % change on previous year 0.364 % change on previous year 0.885 % change on previous year Uzbekistan
2020s -0.3466 % change on previous year 1.07 % change on previous year 1.41 % change on previous year Uzbekistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Uzbekistan?
Uzbekistan, at 1.18 % change on previous year against -0.33 % change on previous year in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
1.51 % change on previous year, with Uzbekistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Uzbekistan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 25th and Uzbekistan ranks 28th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/uzbekistan/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Uzbekistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.