New Caledonia vs Turkmenistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

New Caledonia
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
Turkmenistan
0 % change on previous year
in 2025
New Caledonia rank
93rd
Turkmenistan rank
93rd

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Turkmenistan
00.511.5199120082025

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turkmenistan ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 93rd and Turkmenistan ranks 93rd of 249 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 2 and Turkmenistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Turkmenistan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0812 % change on previous year 0.077 % change on previous year 0.0041 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2000s 0.0212 % change on previous year 0.3238 % change on previous year 0.3026 % change on previous year Turkmenistan
2010s 0.6242 % change on previous year 0.0347 % change on previous year 0.5895 % change on previous year New Caledonia
2020s 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year 0 % change on previous year —

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, New Caledonia or Turkmenistan?
New Caledonia, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between New Caledonia and Turkmenistan?
0 % change on previous year, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Turkmenistan?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do New Caledonia and Turkmenistan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
New Caledonia ranks 93rd and Turkmenistan ranks 93rd of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Turkmenistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/turkmenistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/new-caledonia/turkmenistan/">New Caledonia vs Turkmenistan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.