Tuvalu vs Western Sahara: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate

Tuvalu
-0.75 % change on previous year
in 2025
Western Sahara
-0.782 % change on previous year
in 2025
Tuvalu rank
217th
Western Sahara rank
220th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate over time

  • Tuvalu
  • Western Sahara
-1-0.500.51199120082025

How they compare

Tuvalu currently reports -0.75 % change on previous year against -0.782 % change on previous year in Western Sahara, a difference of 0.032 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Tuvalu ahead.

Tuvalu ranks 217th and Western Sahara ranks 220th of 249 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Tuvalu averaged higher in 2 and Western Sahara in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tuvalu Western Sahara Difference Ahead
1990s 0.084 % change on previous year -0.0844 % change on previous year 0.1684 % change on previous year Tuvalu
2000s 0.0006 % change on previous year 0.3521 % change on previous year 0.3516 % change on previous year Western Sahara
2010s 0.0011 % change on previous year 0.3043 % change on previous year 0.3032 % change on previous year Western Sahara
2020s -0.1241 % change on previous year -0.6193 % change on previous year 0.4952 % change on previous year Tuvalu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate, Tuvalu or Western Sahara?
Tuvalu, at -0.75 % change on previous year against -0.782 % change on previous year in Western Sahara as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate between Tuvalu and Western Sahara?
0.032 % change on previous year, with Tuvalu ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tuvalu and Western Sahara?
35 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2025.
How do Tuvalu and Western Sahara rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate?
Tuvalu ranks 217th and Western Sahara ranks 220th of 249 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tuvalu vs Western Sahara: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 30 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/tuvalu/western-sahara/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-annual-growth-rate/tuvalu/western-sahara/">Tuvalu vs Western Sahara: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
281 places, 9,618 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.