Australia vs Congo: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita

Australia
0.0004 million t per person
in 2025
Congo
0.0005 million t per person
in 2025
Australia rank
12th
Congo rank
10th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
00.0010.0010.0010.001199020072025

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.0005 million t per person against 0.0004 million t per person in Australia, a difference of 0.0001 million t per person.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 12th and Congo ranks 10th of 200 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0006 million t per person 0.0011 million t per person 0.0006 million t per person Congo
2000s 0.0005 million t per person 0.0008 million t per person 0.0004 million t per person Congo
2010s 0.0004 million t per person 0.0006 million t per person 0.0002 million t per person Congo
2020s 0.0004 million t per person 0.0005 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Australia or Congo?
Congo, at 0.0005 million t per person against 0.0004 million t per person in Australia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Australia and Congo?
0.0001 million t per person, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
Australia ranks 12th and Congo ranks 10th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Unit
million t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,114 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.