Belarus vs Chile: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita

Belarus
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
Chile
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
Belarus rank
33rd
Chile rank
30th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time

  • Belarus
  • Chile
000199020072025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.0001 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Belarus, a difference of 0 million t per person.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 34 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 33rd and Chile ranks 30th of 200 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Chile Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million t per person 0.0002 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person Chile
2000s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person Chile
2010s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person Chile
2020s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0 million t per person Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Belarus or Chile?
Chile, at 0.0001 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Belarus and Chile?
0 million t per person, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Chile?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Chile rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
Belarus ranks 33rd and Chile ranks 30th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Chile: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/belarus/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/belarus/chile/">Belarus vs Chile: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Unit
million t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,114 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.