Belarus vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita

Belarus
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
Namibia
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
Belarus rank
33rd
Namibia rank
35th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time

  • Belarus
  • Namibia
00000199020072025

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 0.0001 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 million t per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Namibia ahead.

Belarus ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 35th of 200 countries.

Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million t per person 0.0002 million t per person 0.0002 million t per person Namibia
2000s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0002 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person Namibia
2010s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person Namibia
2020s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0 million t per person Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Belarus or Namibia?
Belarus, at 0.0001 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Namibia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Belarus and Namibia?
0 million t per person, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Namibia?
34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Namibia rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
Belarus ranks 33rd and Namibia ranks 35th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/belarus/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/belarus/namibia/">Belarus vs Namibia: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Unit
million t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,114 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.