Colombia vs Equatorial Guinea: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita

Colombia
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
0.0002 million t per person
in 2025
Colombia rank
27th
Equatorial Guinea rank
24th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time

  • Colombia
  • Equatorial Guinea
000.0010.001199020072025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0002 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Colombia, a difference of 0.0001 million t per person.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Colombia's.

Across all 36 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 27th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 200 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0002 million t per person 0.0006 million t per person 0.0004 million t per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0002 million t per person 0.0004 million t per person 0.0002 million t per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0002 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0002 million t per person 0 million t per person Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Colombia or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0002 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Colombia as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Colombia and Equatorial Guinea?
0.0001 million t per person, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Equatorial Guinea?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Colombia and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
Colombia ranks 27th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Equatorial Guinea: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/colombia/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/colombia/equatorial-guinea/">Colombia vs Equatorial Guinea: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Unit
million t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,114 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.