Costa Rica vs United States: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita

Costa Rica
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
United States
0.0001 million t per person
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
48th
United States rank
47th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time

  • Costa Rica
  • United States
00000199020072025

How they compare

United States currently reports 0.0001 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 million t per person.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 48th and United States ranks 47th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and United States in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica United States Difference Ahead
1990s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0 million t per person Costa Rica
2000s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0 million t per person Costa Rica
2010s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0 million t per person Costa Rica
2020s 0.0001 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0 million t per person United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Costa Rica or United States?
United States, at 0.0001 million t per person against 0.0001 million t per person in Costa Rica as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Costa Rica and United States?
0 million t per person, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and United States?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and United States rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
Costa Rica ranks 48th and United States ranks 47th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs United States: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/costa-rica/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/costa-rica/united-states/">Costa Rica vs United States: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Unit
million t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,114 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.