Cuba vs Mali: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Cuba
0 million t per person
in 2025
Mali
0 million t per person
in 2025
Cuba rank
80th
Mali rank
81st
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Mali
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Mali, a difference of 0 million t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mali ahead.
Cuba ranks 80th and Mali ranks 81st of 200 countries.
Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | Mali |
| 2000s | 0 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Mali |
| 2010s | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Mali |
| 2020s | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Cuba or Mali?
- Cuba, at 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Mali as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Cuba and Mali?
- 0 million t per person, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Mali?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Mali rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 80th and Mali ranks 81st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.