Curacao vs Gabon: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Curacao
0.0016 million t per person
in 2025
Gabon
0.0016 million t per person
in 2025
Curacao rank
3rd
Gabon rank
4th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Curacao
- Gabon
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0.0016 million t per person against 0.0016 million t per person in Gabon, a difference of 0 million t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Gabon ahead.
Curacao ranks 3rd and Gabon ranks 4th of 200 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Gabon in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0017 million t per person | 0.002 million t per person | 0.0003 million t per person | Gabon |
| 2020s | 0.0019 million t per person | 0.0017 million t per person | 0.0002 million t per person | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Curacao or Gabon?
- Curacao, at 0.0016 million t per person against 0.0016 million t per person in Gabon as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Curacao and Gabon?
- 0 million t per person, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Gabon?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Curacao and Gabon rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Curacao ranks 3rd and Gabon ranks 4th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.