Curacao vs Guyana: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Curacao
0.0016 million t per person
in 2025
Guyana
0.0063 million t per person
in 2025
Curacao rank
3rd
Guyana rank
1st
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Curacao
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0.0063 million t per person against 0.0016 million t per person in Curacao, a difference of 0.0047 million t per person.
That makes Guyana's figure about 3.9 times Curacao's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Guyana has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 3rd and Guyana ranks 1st of 200 countries.
Guyana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0017 million t per person | 0.0069 million t per person | 0.0052 million t per person | Guyana |
| 2020s | 0.0019 million t per person | 0.0065 million t per person | 0.0046 million t per person | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Curacao or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 0.0063 million t per person against 0.0016 million t per person in Curacao as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Curacao and Guyana?
- 0.0047 million t per person, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Guyana?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Curacao and Guyana rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Curacao ranks 3rd and Guyana ranks 1st of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.