Curacao vs World: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Curacao
0.0016 million t per person
in 2025
World
0 million t per person
in 2025
Curacao rank
3rd
World rank
2nd
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Curacao
- World
How they compare
Curacao currently reports 0.0016 million t per person against 0 million t per person in World, a difference of 0.0016 million t per person.
That makes Curacao's figure about 42.9 times World's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Curacao has been ahead every year.
Curacao ranks 3rd and World ranks 2nd of 200 countries.
Curacao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Curacao | World | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0017 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0.0017 million t per person | Curacao |
| 2020s | 0.0019 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0.0018 million t per person | Curacao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Curacao or World?
- Curacao, at 0.0016 million t per person against 0 million t per person in World as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Curacao and World?
- 0.0016 million t per person, with Curacao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and World?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Curacao and World rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Curacao ranks 3rd and World ranks 2nd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.