Equatorial Guinea vs Finland: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Equatorial Guinea
0.0002 million t per person
in 2025
Finland
0.0002 million t per person
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
24th
Finland rank
23rd
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 0.0002 million t per person against 0.0002 million t per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0 million t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th and Finland ranks 23rd of 200 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0006 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | 0.0005 million t per person | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.0004 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | 0.0002 million t per person | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.0002 million t per person | 0.0002 million t per person | 0.0001 million t per person | Equatorial Guinea |
| 2020s | 0.0002 million t per person | 0.0002 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Equatorial Guinea or Finland?
- Finland, at 0.0002 million t per person against 0.0002 million t per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Equatorial Guinea and Finland?
- 0 million t per person, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Finland?
- 36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Finland rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th and Finland ranks 23rd of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.