Eritrea vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita

Eritrea
0 million t per person
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
0 million t per person
in 2025
Eritrea rank
97th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
96th

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time

  • Eritrea
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
000199020072025

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Eritrea, a difference of 0 million t per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.

Eritrea ranks 97th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 96th of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eritrea Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1990s 0 million t per person 0.0001 million t per person 0 million t per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0 million t per person 0 million t per person 0 million t per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0 million t per person 0 million t per person 0 million t per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0 million t per person 0 million t per person 0 million t per person Eritrea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Eritrea or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Eritrea as of 2025.
What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Eritrea and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0 million t per person, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Turks and Caicos Islands?
33 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2025.
How do Eritrea and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
Eritrea ranks 97th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 96th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eritrea vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/eritrea/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/forest-land-carbon-stock-in-living-biomass-per-capita/eritrea/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Eritrea vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Unit
million t per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
202 places, 7,114 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.