Malawi vs Sudan: Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita
Malawi
0 million t per person
in 2025
Sudan
0 million t per person
in 2025
Malawi rank
151st
Sudan rank
149th
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita over time
- Malawi
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Malawi, a difference of 0 million t per person.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Malawi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 151st and Sudan ranks 149th of 200 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | 0 million t per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita, Malawi or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 million t per person against 0 million t per person in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita between Malawi and Sudan?
- 0 million t per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Sudan rank globally for forest land — carbon stock in living biomass, per capita?
- Malawi ranks 151st and Sudan ranks 149th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Forest land — Carbon stock in living biomass divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.